<?xml version='1.0'?>
<FHRSEstablishment>
    <Header>
        <ExtractDate>2026-05-21</ExtractDate>
        <ItemCount>1</ItemCount>
        <ReturnCode>Success</ReturnCode>
    </Header>
    <EstablishmentCollection>
        <EstablishmentDetail>
            <AddressLine1>23 Westminster House</AddressLine1>
            <AddressLine2>Festival Place</AddressLine2>
            <AddressLine3>Basingstoke</AddressLine3>
            <AddressLine4>Hampshire</AddressLine4>
            <BusinessName>Spicy Tadka</BusinessName>
            <BusinessType>Restaurant/Cafe/Canteen</BusinessType>
            <BusinessTypeID>1</BusinessTypeID>
            <ChangesByServerID>0</ChangesByServerID>
            <Distance>null</Distance>
            <FHRSID>842529</FHRSID>
            <LocalAuthorityBusinessID>15/00121/CP</LocalAuthorityBusinessID>
            <LocalAuthorityCode>131</LocalAuthorityCode>
            <LocalAuthorityEmailAddress>ehteam@basingstoke.gov.uk</LocalAuthorityEmailAddress>
            <LocalAuthorityName>Basingstoke and Deane</LocalAuthorityName>
            <LocalAuthorityWebSite>http://www.basingstoke.gov.uk</LocalAuthorityWebSite>
            <NewRatingPending>false</NewRatingPending>
            <Phone/>
            <PostCode>RG21 7LS</PostCode>
            <RatingDate>2026-02-24T00:00:00</RatingDate>
            <RatingKey>fhrs_1_en-gb</RatingKey>
            <RatingValue>1</RatingValue>
            <RightToReply>&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;
	While we acknowledge that certain minor lapses were identified during the inspection, we strongly feel that these issues were not of a severity that would justify a hygiene rating. We are particularly concerned that several observations in the inspection report appear to be based on assumptions, using terms such as &amp;amp;ldquo;may be&amp;amp;rdquo; or &amp;amp;ldquo;may cause risk,&amp;amp;rdquo; rather than clear evidence of any immediate or significant risk. Most of the issues raised are structrual instead of food hygine. if there are any serious issues,&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;
	We have taken the inspector&amp;amp;rsquo;s feedback seriously and have already addressed the points raised. The inspector has visited the premisses again on 18th March and council inspector was very happy with the changes.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;
	Inspector say&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;
	&amp;amp;quot;I was really pleased to see the improvements you have made following my initial visit. Please find attached an updated report marking off the actions that have now been completed as &amp;amp;lsquo;done&amp;amp;quot;. Unfortunately as per council inspector, they cant change the rating for next three month so we have tolive with the rating.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;
</RightToReply>
            <SchemeType>FHRS</SchemeType>
            <geocode>
                <longitude>-1.087803</longitude>
                <latitude>51.264861</latitude>
            </geocode>
            <scores>
                <Hygiene>15</Hygiene>
                <Structural>10</Structural>
                <ConfidenceInManagement>20</ConfidenceInManagement>
            </scores>
        </EstablishmentDetail>
    </EstablishmentCollection>
</FHRSEstablishment>